Week 6 Activity – TQM Contributors Practice Due: Mon May 13, 2024 9:00amDue: Mon

May 6, 2024

Week 6 Activity – TQM Contributors Practice

Due: Mon May 13, 2024 9:00amDue: Mon May 13, 2024 9:00am

Ungraded, 30 Possible Points30 Points Possible

In Progress

NEXT UP: Submit Assignment

Unlimited Attempts Allowed

Available after Apr 22, 2024 12:00amAvailable after Apr 22, 2024 12:00am

In this week’s readings, you learned about the major contributors to the development of total quality management (TQM). Some of the methods that each developed are more suited to one application versus another. Select three contributors from the list shown here whose TQM methods could be readily applied to the daily business and medical operations of a medical center or hospital.

  • Philip Crosby.
  • Dr. W. Edwards Deming.
  • Armand Feigenbaum.
  • Dr. Joseph M. Juran.
  • Prof. Kaoru Ishikawa.
  • Genichi Taguchi.
  • Musaaki Imai.

In a Word document:

  1. Describe two of the contributions to the development of TQM for each of the three individuals you selected.
  2. Apply each of the contributions to a specific situation in the operations of a medical center or hospital. Include examples from both the medical and business operations to illustrate the use of TQM.

Week 6 Activity – TQM Contributors Practice
Week 6 Activity – TQM Contributors Practice
Criteria Ratings Pts
Accurate solution, outcome, and/or conclusion is given to address all components presented in the task(s).

10.2 to >9.17 pts

Exemplary

Solutions, outcomes, and/or conclusions are correct and address all relevant components of the problem(s).

9.17 to >8.15 pts

Competent

Solutions, outcomes, and/or conclusions address all relevant components of the problem(s) and are mostly accurate, with minor errors in calculations/charts.

8.15 to >7.13 pts

Needs Improvement

Solutions, outcomes, and/or conclusions address only some of the components of the problem(s) OR there are multiple accuracy errors.

7.13 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Solutions/outcomes given are incorrect.

/ 10.2 pts

Use appropriate strategy and correct process to solve the problem(s) or answer the question(s).

9.9 to >8.9 pts

Exemplary

Used an appropriate strategy and complete process for solving the problem(s) or answering the question(s).

8.9 to >7.91 pts

Competent

Used an appropriate strategy but incomplete process for solving the problem(s) or answering the question(s). 1–2 process steps are missing or incorrect.

7.91 to >6.92 pts

Needs Improvement

Used an inappropriate strategy or application of strategy is unclear. 3–4 process steps are missing or incorrect.

6.92 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Used an incorrect strategy or no strategy is shown for solving the problem(s).

/ 9.9 pts

Communicate the relevance of the solution(s) in the appropriate context using evidence/examples where appropriate.

9.9 to >8.9 pts

Exemplary

Communicated the relevance of the solution(s) in the appropriate context using evidence/examples where appropriate.

8.9 to >7.91 pts

Competent

Communicated the relevance of the solution(s) in the appropriate context.

7.91 to >6.92 pts

Needs Improvement

Communicated the relevance of the solution(s), but not in the appropriate context.

6.92 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Did not communicate the relevance of the solution(s).

/ 9.9 pts

Are you struggling with this assignment?

Our team of qualified writers will write an original paper for you. Good grades guaranteed! Complete paper delivered to straight to your email.

GET HELP WITH YOUR PAPER