So i have to write a debate response based on a debate we did in class. This is what the professor told us “Students must participate in the in-class debates and write up their own arguments based on their own research and what they learnt from class. For this class, students should reflect on what was said during the debate and argue what elements they agreed with and what they did not and why.” the debate is about: rights vs. Security. I was with rights so you know. I will upload 2 photos about the sides we did in class, its a picture of the white board what the teacher wrote. Btw the first debate response i did that one with essay service as well and i got 87.5 and this was ny proffesors feedback : “The strongest argument relates to adaptability (not flexibility), as laws can change. Flexible implies that laws can be interpreted differently to accommodate different situations.
The problem is that the argument can easily be reversed and claim that law alone (without virtue) is insufficient to promote justice.
A second problem is that virtues are characterised as inherent in a person, and not social. This assertion needs to be supported, as society is often intensely interested in debating virtue.
The claim that virtue has no mechanism for accountability needs to be supported, as it appears to be unfounded.” I hope i can get a grade in the 90s for this one. If you have any questions let me know