***public speaking ***
Informative Speech Videos and Peer Review 1
Informative Speech Videos and Peer Review 1
You have to deliver  Informative Speech Videos and Peer Review 1 you have to write then i have to create video by myself about 5 to 7 minutes  ***** by next 8 hour ***
===============================================================
Discussion for Week XIII
What 3 reasons are given for the practice of affirmative action in hiring or university admissions?
What are the challenges to (arguments against) the compensatory argument for affirmative action?
What are the arguments for promoting diversity by way of affirmative action? What objections are raised about that?
What are your own feelings for or against affirmative action? On what considerations do you base your point of view?
(Ch. 9)
What is the difference between moral individualism and collective responsibility?
What does Sandel mean when he says, “ the freely chosen self and the neutral state go hand in hand?” (p. 216) What is Sandel’s opinion of this notion?
Explain the ways in which our government is and is not morally neutral.
At the end of chapter 9, Sandel asks some rhetorical questions related to justice and moral engagement. What is the point he is making?
=================================================================
5116 – PUBLIC SPEAKING DISCUSSION
Discussion Discussion #5: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos, due Wednesday, April 24, 2024 9:00 PM.Discussion #5: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos
Persuasive appeals are around us all the time. Let’s explore them together this week.
Choose at least one of the following videos and pay attention to the persuasive appeals the video uses.
================================================================
This week, we’re continuing with our reading and discussion of the Justice book, which I hope you’re enjoying. We’ll be covering Chapters 4 and 5, so be sure to read those, as well as my lecture notes about last week’s readings,  and then go to the Discussion Board and participate in the discussion.  I’ve put links in the Module to further episodes of Sandel’s Harvard class, though I won’t be giving any more extra credit for watching them. I’m just doing so for those who are interested.  Besides, I think it really helps to watch them for Sandel’s explanations of the material that he covers in his book.
Note that for this week, you only have one Reading Response to send me, and it should cover both chapters. Remember, the Reading Response should be at least 350 words.
This week, we’re continuing with our reading and discussion of the Justice book, which I hope you’re enjoying. We’ll be covering Chapters 4 and 5, so be sure to read those, as well as my lecture notes about last week’s readings,  and then go to the Discussion Board and participate in the discussion.  I’ve put links in the Module to further episodes of Sandel’s Harvard class, though I won’t be giving any more extra credit for watching them. I’m just doing so for those who are interested.  Besides, I think it really helps to watch them for Sandel’s explanations of the material that he covers in his book.
Note that for this week, you only have one Reading Response to send me, and it should cover both chapters. Remember, the Reading Response should be at least 350 words. Also, though I’ve said this many times, if you’ve missed turning in any Reading Responses due during the semester, you can still turn them in for reduced credit, which is better than no credit at all.
=================================================================
5770 – CRTCL THNKNG: WRTG ABT NON-FIC DISCUSSION
Discussion Discussion for Week XIV: Justice, Chapter 10 has a to do time at Tuesday, April 23, 2024 11:59 PM.Discussion for Week XIV: Justice, Chapter 10
Chapter 10, Justice
According to Sandel, how was Barak Obama different from previous liberals when it came to moral liberalism?
What are Sandel’s objections to liberal morality?
According to Sandel, why is it not possible to be neutral when discussing such issues as abortion, stem cell research,, and same sex marriage?
Briefly summarize the 4 different ways which Sandel proposes for what the calls ‘the politics of the common good.’
What is your opinion about Sandel’s proposal?