Please respond to at least two other students. Peer responses must be of sufficient length to address the discussion prompt sufficiently and sufficient substance to be meaningful (a good guide is for it to be around 100-150 words), substantive (i.e., address the content of the post and the lesson material), and grounded in the lesson material and literature. A good way to address this requirement is to make direct reference to at least one of the assigned readings and/or the lesson material in each of your required peer responses. You may challenge, support, or supplement another student’s answer using the terms, concepts, and theories from the required readings. Also, do not be afraid to respectfully disagree where you feel appropriate, as this should be part of your analysis process at this academic level.
Answer 1: self-explanatory
Answer 2: self-explanatory 
Answer 3: self-explanatory 
When writing your response, please include in the text of the answer:
– one question
– a new fact and/or a new perspective
– use one source and cite the source at the end
We use in-text parenthetical references supported with complete citations at the end to provide proper attrbituion.
The proper format for  an intext reference is author’s last name and date of publication, page #(s). For example, (Jordan 2023, 35-7). You would also provide a complete citation for this work at the bottom of your post / end of your writing assignment.
– information that would support a further conversation
– address the post
Write all answers in the same document and mark them as Answer 1, Answer 2, and Answer 3 (separately).