MUST ANSWER THE 5 QUESTIONS IN 5 SECTIONS:
1.
Dennett recommends that sometimes we should assume that a system is perfectly
rational, and adopt the intentional stance, so that we can explain and predict the behavior of the
system, by reference to its environment and its beliefs and desires. What does Dennett think
determines the meanings of “belief” and “desire”, which we use when we adopt the intentional
stance? Why do you conclude this? (Note: I ask what determines these meanings, not what these
meanings are. Which of the semantical theories — from Churchland’s Chapter 3 — best matches
Dennett’s views regarding how these terms get their meanings?) [15 points] 
2.
When Dennett adopts the intentional stance and ascribes beliefs and desires, what
solution to the methodological problem (cf. Churchland’s Chapter 5) is he proposing? Why do
you conclude this? [15 points]
3.
When Dennett adopts the design stance, what solution to the methodological problem (cf.
Churchland’s Chapter 5) is he proposing? Why do you conclude this? [15 points]
4.
When Dennett adopts the physical stance, what solution to the methodological problem
(cf. Churchland’s Chapter 5) is he proposing? Why do you conclude this? [15 points]
5.
Dennett says adopting the intentional stance can be the best way to explain and predict
the behavior of humans and some other systems. However, he also says (p.95) there are no
perfectly rational systems — the assumption that we are perfectly rational, inherent in the
intentional stance, is false. Does that make him an eliminative materialist who denies that there
really are beliefs and desires? Why do you conclude this? What do you think Dennett would
offer as a solution to the ontological problem (cf. Churchland’s Chapter 2)? Why do you
conclude this? Note: I am most concerned with the reasons you give. (Do not search-out what
Dennett say elsewhere about the ontological problem. I’m asking how you think he would
answer, given what he says in this journal article.) [40 points]