Martha Stewart, a renowned businesswoman and media personality, became a household name through her successful ventures in cooking, entertaining, and home decor. Her career, however, faced a significant setback in 2004 when she was convicted of charges related to insider trading. Stewart’s legal troubles began in 2001 when she sold nearly 4,000 shares of the biopharmaceutical company ImClone Systems based on a tip she received from her broker. This sale occurred just before a public announcement that caused ImClone’s stock to plummet. Although many speculated that she engaged in insider trading, Stewart was ultimately convicted of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and making false statements to federal investigators, but not insider trading itself. Her five-month prison sentence sparked widespread media coverage and public interest, raising questions about the complexities of securities law and the enforcement of insider trading regulations.
Examine the federal statute on insider trading. 
Does the language of the statute itself help explain why Martha Stewart was not charged with insider trading? Explain your response.