Examine vertical non-price exclusionary conduct as potential anti-competitive activity using the following case — N.Y. Medscan LLC v. N.Y. Univ. School of Medicine – 430_F.Supp.2d_140, 150 (S.D.N.Y 2006), defend your position.
Written Essay Rubric
Written Essay Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Application of Course Materials
The student demonstrates their critical analysis and synthesis of the ideas, theories, and models presented in the assigned readings and videos, and applies their analysis and synthesis of the concepts to the assignment’s requirements.
15 to >13.0 pts
Superior
Analyzed and explained all relevant concepts and requirements addressed in the assignment’s instructions in a coherent and compelling manner that demonstrates the learner’s ability to apply and effectively utilize course concepts.
13 to >10.0 pts
Average
Analyzed and explained many relevant concepts and requirements addressed in the assignment’s instructions in a coherent and compelling manner that demonstrates the learner’s ability to apply and effectively utilize course concepts.
10 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Analyzed and explained few relevant concepts and requirements addressed in the assignment’s instructions in a coherent and compelling manner. Did not demonstrate the ability to apply and effectively utilize course concepts.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRationale and Support for Ideas/Claims
The student refers to assigned readings and videos to support their arguments and claims, provides in-text citations, and develops a clear rationale between ideas and concepts relevant to the assignment topic.
15 to >14.0 pts
Superior
Supported all of the paper’s central ideas with direct reference to all the assigned readings and videos needed for this assignment, used in-text citations, and made unique and original points with solid logic.
14 to >6.0 pts
Average
Supported most of the paper’s central ideas with direct reference to most the assigned readings and videos needed for this assignment, used in-text citations, and made unique and original points with solid logic.
6 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Relied primarily on personal opinion and did not provide support for ideas from the assigned readings and videos.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting
The student adheres to the paper format standard specified in the Syllabus in all aspects of the paper.
5 to >4.0 pts
Superior
Followed the paper formatting standard without exception.
4 to >3.0 pts
Above Average
Followed the paper formatting standard with few exceptions.
3 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Did not follow the paper formatting standard in key elements of the paper format or with consistency.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrate Good Grammar and Composition
Student organizes paper well and presents a paper that is well written and free of grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
5 to >4.0 pts
Superior
Demonstrated superior professionalism and graduate-level writing by organizing the paper extremely well, writing in a thorough yet succinct manner, and presented zero grammatical & spelling errors
4 to >3.0 pts
Above Average
Demonstrated above average professionalism and graduate-level writing by organizing the paper effectively, writing in a thorough yet succinct manner, and presented very few (1 or 2) grammatical, spelling and composition errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Average
Demonstrated average professional and graduate-level writing by organizing the paper adequately, writing that at times lacked direction, relevance, or detail, and presented few (3 or 4) grammatical & spelling errors.
2 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
There was a demonstrated a need to improve the paper’s organization, clarity and/or relevance of sentences, and reduce grammatical & spelling errors to show graduate-level writing skills.
5 pts
Total Points: 40