300 words each
D-1
Prior to beginning work on the discussion forum, be certain to have read all the required resources for this week.
In your initial post, identify and discuss the three ethical systems highlighted in the text, McDavid et al. (2019), in Chapter 12: deontological ethics, duty ethics, and consequentialism. For your initial posting,
Provide a reasoned argument for which of the three ethical approaches is best to use in criminal justice as a whole and for your program evaluation proposal.
Provide at least one APA scholarly source not provided in the classroom materials to support your position.
You may choose to present a different ethical approach than the three theories listed above and in the text as the best “fit” for criminal justice as a whole and for your program evaluation proposal from the required readings or from a scholarly source beyond the classroom materials.
D-2
Prior to beginning work on the discussion forum, be certain to have read all the required resources for this week.
All evaluations are conducted, and ultimately exist, in a social environment and can be affected by various social, cultural, political, and economic forces. Based on what you have learned through working on your final summative paper, put your selected topic in its appropriate social context.
Identify and explain the impact of political issues associated with the proposal.
The discussion should focus both on political factors such as socioeconomics, race, or gender, as well as political nuances that might include issues pertaining to the program being utilized for the proposal.
Predict how your proposal will yield actionable results to improve your chosen program.
Identify and discuss the most surprising thing you found in your research that caused you to reevaluate a previously held opinion.