This is based on my previous order,  please I will need that the same person that is woring on my previous order, will work on this one as well, because it is a continuation. Forensic psychologists may do assessments for either the prosecution or defense. Once an assessment has been completed, a written report is commonly used to communicate the forensic psychologist’s conclusion. It may include items like potential origins of the behaviors (both biological and environmental, speaking to the classic nature versus nurture argument in psychology), current manifestations of the behavior and potential diagnosis, assessment approach, and other ethical or demographic considerations related to the case. In Assessment 3, you will continue reviewing the case you explored in Assessment 2 and apply your knowledge and skills related to assessment and ethics to provide a final report.
NOTE: This assessment builds on Assessment 2. It’s recommended that you complete Assessment 2 before Assessment 3.
Review the case study you chose (Derek) from the Criminal Offenders: Case Studies media piece.
Review the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for:
Depressive disorders.
Bipolar and related disorders.
Anxiety disorders.
Schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders.
locate three peer-reviewed journal articles:
At least one article on the mental health disorder.
At least one article on the assessment you chose.
Instructions:
Write and submit a 5–7 page report summarizing Derek’s  diagnosis and its influence on their behavior.
In your paper, include the following:
State the disorder Derek or Meredith show signs of having.
Reference the DSM-5-TR when you do this, and specifically state how they meet the diagnostic criteria for that disorder.
This discussion should be approximately one page.
Describe the mental health assessment you chose. Discuss the assessment’s validity and reliability.
Be sure to demonstrate how this assessment is appropriate for your case study.
This discussion should be approximately one page.
Discuss the possible biological, developmental, behavioral, situational, and protective factors that may explain or cause the behaviors in the case study.
This discussion should be approximately one to two pages.
Discuss ethical considerations related to assessing this client and provide examples.
This discussion should be approximately one page.
Review the crime as described in Criminal Offenders: Case Studies and describe how the disorder influenced the commission of the crime.
This discussion should be approximately one to two pages.
Additional requirement:
Your paper should meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to the APA style and formatting standards.
References: At least six references—your textbook, APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, the DSM-5-TR, and three peer-reviewed journal articles. Note: You can use sources you found for Assessment 2.
Length of paper: 5–7 typed, double-spaced pages of content, in addition to the title page and references page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
This is the main guide to follow because the professor will base his grading on this scoring guide, please stick to distinguished.
case study.
Derek’s Story
Derek is a twenty-year-old, African American patient who is accused of second-degree murder for killing a twenty-one-year-old female (Yvonne) one year ago, and was subsequently certified into a state forensic hospital for further evaluation and treatment while awaiting trial. His counsel intends to allege that he was in a dissociative state, due to possible drug use, when he stabbed the victim to death.
Childhood
Derek is an only child. From the age of five, his teachers and parents noted undue aggression, distractibility, and a lack of concentration. By his own admission, he was impulsive, acted out, and experienced temper tantrums three to four times per week. At school and at home his temper problems continued and he was described at school as “a bully with no friends.” His parents noted that around the age of nine, they began to see a cycle developing. In the first stage of the cycle, he would start school, a project, or a new routine motivated and positive. His positive beginnings were short-lived however, and he would become frustrated, blow up and get angry, followed by a calm period. His parents noted that his ability to cope with feelings such as frustration related to the phase of the cycle.
At the age of thirteen, his maternal grandfather, with whom he was very close, died. This was devastating to him. He took this quite badly as his grandfather was a significant person in his life. In grade seven (age thirteen), he attended a new school, and although he was very anxious about starting there, the year began well. However, within six months his parents reported that he had poor peer relationships and was bullying other children. He was suspended for stealing items from other students’ lockers. During this period, he reports that he frequently lied and stole from his parents. Derek admitted in the intake interview that he started using marijuana and having frequent sex when he was thirteen.
Home Life
Derek’s parents state that there was a great deal of emotional tension in the house. He was referred to the Nelson Treatment Centre for assessment but refused to see the therapist. During the summer months in subsequent years, he spent a lot of time at the family cottage and seemed to benefit greatly from his relationship with Yvonne (the murder victim). The relationship was described by his parents as a “brother-sister” relationship. He returned to school in September each year, but was suspended often for infrequent attendance. His mother reports that he was difficult to tolerate because of his drug use and his refusal to do any chores around the house. His mother reported that she was afraid of him because his outbursts were so unpredictable.
An unchaperoned house party led to substantial damage to Derek’s house and this resulted in a significant confrontation with his parents. His parents asked him to leave (he had just turned eighteen) and he spent several weeks living in Yvonne’s apartment. He reports that his status at her apartment was one of a friend who was staying with her temporarily.
During this period, he had a girlfriend who broke up with him. His parents reported that he was quite upset by this. He stole Yvonne’s car, drove to his grandmother’s summer cottage, and broke in. He vandalized several cottages. After spending two days at the cottage, he decided to return the car to Yvonne.
However, he panicked when he saw the police at the roadblock (checking for drunk drivers). The police chased him but he managed to lose them. He hid for an hour and started driving again but fell asleep while driving and the car ended up in the ditch. He walked to the nearest town, went to the police department, and told them what happened. He was arrested and sent to the Mental Health Center for a court-ordered assessment. He was given a one-year probation (convicted of six counts of breaking and entering, taking an automobile without consent, and careless driving). His conditions of treatment included seeing a doctor and attending group therapy.
Pre-Murder
About six weeks prior to the homicide, Derek reports that he started having what he called “rushes” in which he would feel very strange, tense, and agitated. The acute stage would last for about five minutes but he would continue to feel strange for a few hours. His parents had left town on a two-week holiday and he was staying at home alone. He sought help from his uncle who took him to the emergency room at the hospital. The doctor described Derek as being “very anxious, continually clenching his fists” and gave him a prescription for diazepam.
The night prior to the homicide he stayed at a friend’s house partying (doing acid and drinking vodka). The next evening around 9:00 p.m. he went to stay with Yvonne. He reports waking up at 3:00 a.m. trying to control his feelings of panic and his need to run away. He was having suicidal thoughts and felt that he needed to take Yvonne’s car and get away. At some point he remembers the knife being in his hand and that he was stabbing Yvonne in a state of extreme emotional rage (victim was stabbed approximately sixteen times). He claims he did not remember the actual attack, but he remembers feeling a sense of relief some time afterward. He remembers covering the body with a sheet. He says he took a shower, changed clothes, took her car keys, and left. He went to work and told them he did not feel well. When asked about cuts on his hands he claimed he had cut his hand when changing a tire. He returned to Yvonne’s apartment and took her car and left the city heading towards his grandmother’s cottage. The car broke down several miles outside the city. When the police stopped to ask him if he needed help he acted very confused and could not identify himself. The police arrested him.
Post-Murder
Derek has not been able to explain adequately the motivation behind his actions. He reports he does not understand why he would have killed his “best friend.” During the interview, he talked at length about his friendship with Yvonne, described her as like a big sister to him, and expressed remorse for what he had done. He stated that he felt she was the only person in the world that he could turn to and that he valued her friendship and support.
When he first arrived at this hospital, Derek reported that he wanted to gain insight into his behavior. More recent reports, however, indicate that he blames the homicide on his mental illness and is refusing to take part in psychotherapy. In the last four months, he seems to have gained a measure of control over his impulses and has not been a management problem on the unit. According to nursing reports, Derek tends to have somewhat condescending attitude towards the other patients and can be sarcastic to staff when denied a request. It has also been noted that Derek will “go shopping from staff to staff when he does not receive the answer he wants.”
Case Study: Final Report Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Apply DSM-5-TR criteria to a case study. Does not identify or apply DSM-5-TR criteria to a case study. Identifies but does not apply DSM-5-TR criteria to a case study. Applies DSM-5-TR criteria to a case study. Applies DSM-5-TR criteria to a case study using evidence from a professional or scholarly source.
Apply reliability, validity, and generalizability to a chosen assessment. Does not identify or apply reliability, validity, and generalizability to a chosen assessment. Identifies but does not apply reliability, validity, and generalizability to a chosen assessment. Applies reliability, validity, and generalizability to a chosen assessment. Applies reliability, validity, and generalizability to a chosen assessment with evidence from a peer-reviewed journal article.
Interpret behavior based on biological, behavioral, situational, developmental, and protective factors. Does not describe or interpret behavior based on biological, behavioral, situational, developmental, and protective factors. Describes but does not interpret behavior based on biological, behavioral, situational, developmental, and protective factors. Interprets behavior based on biological, behavioral, situational, developmental, and protective factors. Interprets behavior based on biological, behavioral, situational, developmental, and protective factors using evidence from a professional or scholarly source.
Apply ethical principles to an assessment in forensic psychology. Does not describe or apply ethical principles to an assessment in forensic psychology. Describes but does not apply ethical principles to an assessment in forensic psychology. Applies ethical principles to an assessment in forensic psychology. Applies ethical principles to an assessment in forensic psychology using examples.
Develop an explanation of the relationship between the mental health disorder and the crime. Does not develop an explanation on or describe the relationship between the mental health disorder and the crime. Describes the crime but does not develop an explanation on the relationship between the mental health disorder and the crime. Develops an explanation on the relationship between the mental health disorder and the crime. Develops an explanation on the relationship between the mental health disorder and the crime using evidence from a professional or scholarly source.
Apply evidence from peer-reviewed journal articles. Does not apply evidence from peer-reviewed journal articles. Applies evidence from one peer-reviewed journal article. Applies evidence from peer-reviewed journal articles. Applies evidence from three or more peer-reviewed journal articles.
Use APA style formatting for citations and reference list with only minor errors. Does not use citations or have a reference list. Uses APA style formatting for citations and reference list but has major errors. Uses APA style formatting for citations and reference list with only minor errors. Uses APA style formatting for citations with no errors and a reference list with no more than minor errors.
Address assessment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences. Does not respond to the assessment prompt or does not organize text appropriately, uses inappropriate tone, or does not include structurally sound sentences. Addresses the assessment purpose with minimal issues related to evidence, tone, and sentence structure. Addresses assessment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences. Presents a focused purpose through strong organizational skills. Presents evidence through strong paraphrasing and summarizing, as well as appropriate tone and sentence structure.