Instructions
Students are required to answer the following questions as well ensure all the components (in the below section) are complete. To receive full credit for each question, students’ responses must be thorough and exhibit strong critical and analytical skills. For opinion based questions, students are to state their opinion and provide evidence from the textbook and other credible sources to support their opinion (in-text citations are required). Responses must be original and exhibit strong knowledge of the course materials. Binary responses ARE PROHIBITED and will result in a zero for that particular question. Students are to type the questions and responses.
Formatting
All case study analysis must be APA formatted
A title page is required (I have provided a sample of the cover page in the Module entitled “Case Study Analysis”).
Page limit- 3-4 pages.
Header- left margin name of the case, “Marsingill v. O’Malley,” right margin- last name, first name
Double spaced, Times New Roman, 12 font size
Students are to type the questions and their responses should be recorded underneath each question. Responses must include 5 sentences, not to exceed 6 sentences. One point deduction will be applied if students exceed the sentence limitation.
SAVE DOCUMENT AS PDF
Case questions
1.Describe how the principles of patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice may have been violated in the case.
2.Is this an issue of professional ethics?
3.How did the physician’s actions involve the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence?
4.Considering a patient’s rights and responsibilities, what rights were violated, if any?
5.What responsibilities, if any, did the patient not assume?
6.Do you agree with the court’s decision that the jury should have been instructed to use the reasonable patient standard? Discuss your answer.
7..What are the relevant ethical and legal facts and issues in the case?
8.Is there other information that might be helpful in the resolution of the dilemma presented?
9.InDiscuss the court’s reasoning as to how and why it reached its decision?
Helpful Hints to Consider when analyzing a case
1.Each case is given a title that signals the type of case about to be reviewed.
2.Students may wish to research cases cited in this text in order to gain a deeper understanding of the topics covered. A case citation describes the identity of the parties in the case, the text in which the case can be found, and the year in which the case was decided.
3. A review of the details of the case.
4. The issues discussed in any given case are selected for review on the basis of medical and legal importance to the healthcare professional. Although any one case may have multiple issues, only those considered pertinent are reviewed here.
5.The court’s ruling based on the facts, issues, and applicable laws pertaining to the case.
6.The rationale behind how the court arrived at its decision based on the facts, issues, and relevant laws surrounding the case.
7. Discussion questions, although prompted by a particular case, may not necessarily be germane to the facts of the case. The questions are merely presented as opportunities for discussion about the issues raised in the case and do not add to the facts of a specific case.