Discussion 26 (Ch 34)
“The U.S. has the lowest life expectancy and the highest disease burden among comparable developed countries, including Australia.  The U.S. spends about $8,745 per capita on health care costs, compared to  $3,997 per person, in Australia.”
After reading chapter 34 and the links on “How Income and Wealth are Linked to Health and Longevity” and “Inventing a New Paradigm for Care,”  choose TWO questions from below (restate the questions). 
Health care is a personal issue. Assuring the health of the public, goes beyond focusing on the health status of individuals; it requires a population health approach.  What does this statement mean to you? Can we learn/gain anything from other countries such as Australia to improve our public health care?
The reasons for preventive medicine argues that the knowledge we already possess is sufficient. If we put into practice, we can achieve great health gains for all and reduce our inequalities in health. What sufficient knowledge are they referring to? What health gains can be accomplished and what are the benefits?
“Where there is less economic disparity, there tends to be less social disparity and more support that benefit public health” What economic and social policy interventions and support are likely to benefit public health?
How do public health researchers and practitioners take the lead in creating public awareness? 
What are your thoughts about this new vision for a health care system? “Inventing a New Paradigm for Care.” Is this beneficial for all?  Why/why not?
read: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/49116/2000178-How-are-Income-and-Wealth-Linked-to-Health-and-Longevity.pdf
watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwCV1GWjiAs
In 350 words, write your thoughts on the related material that resonated with you in the assigned readings.  
PLEASE DO NOT USE AI AND PROVIDE ME WITH TURNITIN REPORT. PLEASE MAKE THE DISCUSSION CONVERSATIONAL, USE YOUR OPINION ON THE TOPIC AS WELL. PLEASE USE BOTH OF ABOVE SOURCES, NOT ANY OTHER SOURCES.